2015 Federal & CA Tax Rates, Tax Tables, Personal Exemptions, and Standard Deductions | US Tax Center

I am always finding myself looking up the Federal and California tax brackets so I thought I would add the info here for quick reference.

For your 2016 Federal & CA Tax Rates, Tax Tables, Personal Exemptions, and Standard Deductions | US Tax Center please click here for our updated article.

This post is fairly long and is one of my most popular pages.  I made some Quick Links to make it easier to navigate to the section you want:

Federal Tax Rates, Tax Brackets, Personal Exemptions, Standard Deductions

2015 California Tax Rates, Tax Tables, Personal Exemptions and Standard Deductions

2015 Federal Tax Rates, Tax Tables, Personal Exemptions and Standard Deductions

This article gives you the tax rates and related numbers that you will need to prepare your 2015 income tax return. In general, 2015 individual tax returns are due by April 15, 2016.

Source: 2015 Federal Tax Rates, Personal Exemptions, and Standard Deductions | US Tax Center

 

Single:

Taxable Income Tax Rate
$0 to $9,225 10%
$9,226 to $37,450 $922.50 plus 15% of the amount over $9,225
$37,451 to $90,750 $5,156.25 plus 25% of the amount over $37,450
$90,751 to $189,300 $18,481.25 plus 28% of the amount over $90,750
$189,301 to $411,500 $46,075.25 plus 33% of the amount over $189,300
$411,501 to $413,200 $119,401.25 plus 35% of the amount over $411,500
$413,201 or more $119,996.25 plus 39.6% of the amount over $413,200

 

Married Filing Jointly or Qualifying Widow(er):

Taxable Income Tax Rate
$0 to $18,450 10%
$18,451 to $74,900 $1,845.00 plus 15% of the amount over $18,450
$74,901 to $151,200 $10,312.50 plus 25% of the amount over $74,900
$151,201 to $230,450 $29,387.50 plus 28% of the amount over $151,200
$230,451 to $411,500 $51,577.50 plus 33% of the amount over $230,450
$411,501 to $464,850 $111,324.00 plus 35% of the amount over $411,500
$464,851 or more $129,996.50 plus 39.6% of the amount over $464,850

 

Married Filing Separately:

Taxable Income Tax Rate
$0 to $9,225 10%
$9,226 to $37,450 $922.50 plus 15% of the amount over $9,225
$37,451 to $75,600 $5,156.25 plus 25% of the amount over $37,450
$75,601 to $115,225 $14,693.75 plus 28% of the amount over $75,600
$115,226 to $205,750 $25,788.75 plus 33% of the amount over $115,225
$205,751 to $232,425 $55,662.00 plus 35% of the amount over $205,750
$232,426 or more $64,998.25 plus 39.6% of the amount over $232,425

 

Head of Household:

Taxable Income Tax Rate
$0 to $13,150 10%
$13,151 to $50,200 $1,315.00 plus 15% of the amount over $13,150
$50,201 to $129,600 $6,872.50 plus 25% of the amount over $50,200
$129,601 to $209,850 $26,772.50 plus 28% of the amount over $129,600
$209,851 to $411,500 $49,192.50 plus 33% of the amount over $209,850
$411,501 to $439,000 $115,737.00 plus 35% of the amount over $411,500
$439,001 or more $125,362.00 plus 39.6% of the amount over $439,000

 

2015 Personal Exemption Amounts

You are allowed to claim one personal exemption for yourself and one for your spouse (if married). However, if somebody else can list you as a dependent on their tax return, you are not permitted to claim a personal exemption for yourself.

For tax year 2015, the personal exemption amount is $4,000 (up from $3,950 in 2014).

The personal exemption amount “phases out” for taxpayers with higher incomes. The Personal Exemption Phaseout (PEP) thresholds are as follows:

Filing Status PEP Threshold Starts PEP Threshold Ends
Single $258,250 $380,750
Married Filing Jointly $309,900 $432,400
Married Filing Separately $154,950 $216,200
Head of Hosuehold $284,050 $406,550

 

2015 Standard Deduction Amounts

There are two main types of tax deductions: the standard deduction and itemized deductions. You can claim one type of deduction on your tax return, but not both. For example, if you claim the standard deduction, you cannot itemize deductions – and vice versa (if you itemize deductions, you cannot claim the standard deduction). You are allowed to use whichever type of deduction results in the lowest tax.

The standard deduction is subtracted from your Adjusted Gross Income (AGI), thereby reducing your taxable income. For tax year 2015, the standard deduction amounts are as follows:

Filing Status Standard Deduction
Single $6,300
Married Filing Jointly $12,600
Married Filing Separately $6,300
Head of Household $9,250
Qualifying Widow(er) $12,600

 

Please Note that Information Below these lines, refers to California Taxes, Rates, Deduction and the Information Above these lines and this Statement refers to Federal Taxes, Rates, Deductions, Etc.







 

2015 California Tax Rates, Tax Tables, Personal Exemptions and Standard Deductions

Source: https://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms/2015_California_Tax_Rates_and_Exemptions.shtml

Rate of inflation

The rate of inflation in California, for the period from July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015, was 1.3%. The 2015 personal income tax brackets are indexed by this amount.

Corporate tax rates

Entity type Tax rate
Corporations other than banks and financials 8.84%
Banks and financials 10.84%
Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) rate 6.65%
S corporation rate 1.5%
S corporation bank and financial rate 3.5%

Individual tax rates

  • The maximum rate for individuals is 12.3%
  • The AMT rate for individuals is 7%
  • The Mental Health Services Tax Rate is 1% for taxable income in excess of $1,000,000.

Exemption credits

Filing Status/Qualification Exemption amount
Married/Registered Domestic Partner (RDP) filing jointly or qualifying widow(er) $218
Single, married/RDP filing separately, or head of household $109
Dependent $337
Blind $109
Age 65 or older $109

Phaseout of exemption credits

Higher-income taxpayers’ exemption credits are reduced as follows:

Filing status Reduce each credit by: For each: Federal AGI exceeds:
Single $6 $2,500 $178,706
Married/RDP filing separately $6 $1,250 $178,706
Head of household $6 $2,500 $268,063
Married/RDP filing jointly $12 $2,500 $357,417
Qualifying widow(er) $12 $2,500 $357,417

When applying the phaseout amount, apply the $6/$12 amount to each exemption credit, but do not reduce the credit below zero. If a personal exemption credit is less than the phaseout amount, do not apply the excess against a dependent exemption credit.

Standard deductions

The standard deduction amounts for:

Filing status Deduction amount
Single or married/RDP filing separately $4,044
Married/RDP filing jointly, head of household, or qualifying widow(er) $8,088
The minimum standard deduction for dependents $1,050

Reduction in itemized deductions

Itemized deductions must be reduced by the lesser of 6% of the excess of the taxpayer’s federal AGI over the threshold amount or 80% of the amount of itemized deductions otherwise allowed for the taxable year.

Filing status AGI threshold
Single or married/RDP filing separately $178,706
Head of household $268,063
Married/RDP filing jointly or qualifying widow(er) $357,417

Nonrefundable Renter’s credit

This nonrefundable, non-carryover credit for renters is available for:

  • Single or married/RDP filing separately with a California AGI of $38,259 or less.
    • The credit is $60.
  • Married/RDP filing jointly, head of household, or qualifying widow(er) with a California AGI of $76,518 or less.
    • The credit is $120.

Miscellaneous credits

  • Qualified senior head of household credit
    • 2% of California taxable income
    • Maximum California AGI of $69,902
    • Maximum credit of $1,317
  • Joint custody head of household credit/dependent parent credit
    • 30% of net tax
    • Maximum credit of $431

AMT exemption

Filing status Amount
Married/RDP filing jointly or qualifying widow(er) $87,627
Single or head of household $65,721
Married/RDP filing separately, estates, or trusts $43,812

AMT exemption phaseout

Filing status Amount
Married/RDP filing jointly or qualifying widow(er) $328,601
Single or head of household $246,451
Married/RDP filing separately, estates, or trusts $164,299

FTB cost recovery fees

Fee type Fee
Bank and corporation filing enforcement fee $92
Bank and corporation collection fee $334
Personal income tax filing enforcement fee $79
Personal income tax collection fee $226

The personal income tax fees apply to individuals and partnerships, as well as limited liability companies that are classified as partnerships. The bank and corporation fees apply to banks and corporations, as well as limited liability companies that are classified as corporations. Interest does not accrue on these cost recovery fees.

2015 California Tax Rate Schedules

Schedule X — Single or married/RDP filing separately

If the taxable income is
Over But not over Tax is Of amount over
$0 $7,850 $0.00 plus 1.00% $0
$7,850 $18,610 $78.50 plus 2.00% $7,850
$18,610 $29,372 $293.70 plus 4.00% $18,610
$29,372 $40,773 $724.18 plus 6.00% $29,372
$40,773 $51,530 $1,408.24 plus 8.00% $40,773
$51,530 $263,222 $2,268.80 plus 9.30% $51,530
$263,222 $315,866 $21,956.16 plus 10.30% $263,222
$315,866 $526,443 $27,378.49 plus 11.30% $315,866
$526,443 AND OVER $51,173.69 plus 12.30% $526,443

Schedule Y — Married/RDP filing jointly, or qualifying widow(er) with dependent child

If the taxable income is
Over But not over Tax is Of amount over
$0 $15,700 $0.00 plus 1.00% $0
$15,700 $37,220 $157.00 plus 2.00% $15,700
$37,220 $58,744 $587.40 plus 4.00% $37,220
$58,744 $81,546 $1,448.36 plus 6.00% $58,744
$81,546 $103,060 $2,816.48 plus 8.00% $81,546
$103,060 $526,444 $4,537.60 plus 9.30% $103,060
$526,444 $631,732 $43,912.31 plus 10.30% $526,444
$631,732 $1,052,886 $54,756.97 plus 11.30% $631,732
$1,052,886 AND OVER $102,347.37 plus 12.30% $1,052,886

Schedule Z — Head of household

If the taxable income is
Over But not over Tax is Of amount over
$0 $15,710 $0.00 plus 1.00% $0
$15,710 $37,221 $157.10 plus 2.00% $15,710
$37,221 $47,982 $587.32 plus 4.00% $37,221
$47,982 $59,383 $1,017.76 plus 6.00% $47,982
$59,383 $70,142 $1,701.82 plus 8.00% $59,383
$70,142 $357,981 $2,562.54 plus 9.30% $70,142
$357,981 $429,578 $29,331.57 plus 10.30% $357,981
$429,578 $715,962 $36,706.06 plus 11.30% $429,578
$715,962 AND OVER $69,067.45 plus 12.30% $715,962

Individual Filing Requirements

If your gross income or adjusted gross income is more than the amount shown in the chart below for your filing status, age, and number of dependents, then you have a filing requirement.

Filing Status Age as of December 31, 2015* California Gross Income California Adjusted Gross Income
Dependents Dependents
0 1 2 or more 0 1 2 or more
Single or head of household Under 65 $16,256 $27,489 $35,914 $13,005 $24,238 $32,663
65 or older $21,706 $30,131 $36,871 $18,455 $26,880 $33,620
Married/RDP filing jointly or separately Under 65 (both spouses/RDPs) $32,514 $43,747 $52,172 $26,012 $37,245 $45,670
65 or older (one spouse) $37,964 $46,389 $53,129 $31,462 $39,887 $46,627
65 or older
(both spouses/RDPs)
$43,414 $51,839 $58,579 $36,912 $45,337 $52,077
Qualifying widow(er) Under 65 N/A $27,489 $35,914 N/A $24,238 $32,663
65 or older N/A $30,131 $36,871 N/A $26,880 $33,620
Dependent of another person (Any filing status) Under 65 More than your standard deduction
65 or older More than your standard deduction

* If you turn 65 on January 1, 2016, you are considered to be age 65 at the end of 2015.

 

PLEASE NOTE THAT I HAVE COMPILED THIS INFORMATION FOR AN EASY PLACE TO LOOK UP AND REFER TO THE DATA.  I BELIEVE IT ALL TO BE CORRECT BUT I AM NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY TYPOS.  THIS PAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES, PLEASE SPEAK WITH YOUR TAX EXPERT/PREPARER WHEN MAKING TAX DECISIONS.  THIS PAGE SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED TAX ADVICE.

2015 Q3 Stock Market is it 2011 Again or 2008?

2015 Q3 Stock Market, Is it 2011 Q3 Again or 2008 Q3?

UPDATE – 1/20/2015 – We posted an article with the results of the 2015Q4 here:

2015 Q4 Update 2015 Q3 is it 2011 again or 2008?

If this past quarter’s stock market performance sounds familiar, it’s because it is.  We have experienced a similar market performance as we did in the 3rd quarter of 2008 and the 3rd quarter of 2011.

POP QUIZ – Which quarter had worse performance, 2008 Q3 or 2011 Q3?

Answer: 2011 Q3 losing 14.92% vs 2008 Q3 losing 8.87% using Morningstar’s Total US Market Index.

Q3 Comparison

 

Our memory of that ugly 2008 year likely led you to believe Q3 2008 was worse but we actually had worse returns in 2011.

In 2011, we heard story after story about how were were entering into a recession and that investors and how the market was just starting its tumble.   What were the headlines in 2011?

  • Sovereign debt crisis in particular Greece was first and foremost on the news cycle
  • Bond Bubble’s were prominent headlines and fears of the Fed Raising Rates
  • Media Commentators were comparing the bankruptcies of Lehman Brothers and Bear Sterns during the financial crisis and  to Greece, Portugal, Spain, and Ireland and trying to correctly predict a huge market correction.
  • It was difficult at that time to find good financial news anywhere.

What did we say at the time?  Quoting our Quarterly Commentary in Q3 2011 appears appropriate to review:

Recession Looming?

The truth?  No one really knows where the economy is headed.  The stock market is currently pricing in a slowing of the economy and uncertainty in Europe.  If the fear causes consumers to pull back their spending, we could quickly see another recession. 

In 1975, the temptation of market timing was as prevalent as is it is today.  William Sharpe performed statistical analysis of how often a person would have to be correct in order to make money through market timing.  Through statistical analysis, Sharpe demonstrated an investor that can be 100% stocks or 100% cash would have to be correct over 74% of the time to make more money than buy and hold.

Furthermore, Morningstar looked at mutual fund inflows and outflows to determine how effective investors were at timing their purchases.  In US Equities, the average investor earned 0.22% while the average fund over that time period earned 1.59% (http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=325664

).  This data shows that investors typically are poor market timers and tend to “sell low” and “buy high”.

 

 

What Happened in Q4 2011 and Q4 2008?

Q4 Comparison

 

 

 

Q4 2008, would go on to become one of the worst on record while 2011 Q4 would snap back and for the year, 2011 would be in the green.

What is the lesson here?  After a drop like we have experienced this past quarter, its important to recognize that both outcomes can occur.  The market can get worse or it can get better.  Further, it will likely get better or worse more quickly than we can realize or react to.  These two moments in our history show how difficult it can be to time the market.

 

Any Similarities Now to Q3 2008 or Q3 2011?

Right now the stories seem to dominate:

  • International Economic Weakness  (similar to 2011).
  • Bond Market Fears (similar to 2011)
  • Recession Fears (similar to both 2008 and 2011).

2008 Q3 was most focussed on sub prime mortgages and if that was the extent of our financial crisis.  As we would find out in Q4, the financial crisis extended beyond sub prime mortgages and took the entire economy with it.

2008 was one of the worst years in the history of the stock market and historically is an anomaly.  While 2011’s Q3 was a bad quarter, 2011 more of a normal stock market year and ended slightly positive.

I am hopeful that 2015 will be similar to 2011 or at least the 4th quarter being more stable that 2008.  I am fearful that the “animal spirits” and unpredictable nature of the stock market could create another 4th quarter similar to 2008 (although in my opinion, it is unlikely).

I am going to leave you with  a quote from our 2011 Q3 Commentary which I think is appropriate now:

Outlook

Relying on our asset allocation models will help us from letting fear or greed lead us to poor financial decisions.  It’s easy to forget that previous times in history have had just as many uncertainties as we face today.  We will end this quarter’s commentary with a reflection on decade’s past challenges:

  1. 1910’s – World War 1
  2. 1920’s – Rampant Organized Crime (They were so organized they actually had a national convention in Cleveland Ohio December 5th 1928)
  3. 1930’s – Great Depression
  4. 1940’s – World War 2
  5. 1950’s – McCarthyism and the fear of America being infiltrated by communists
  6. 1960’s – Vietnam and the Bay of Pigs
  7. 1970’s – Watergate Scandal, Stagflation, Oil Crisis
  8. 1980’s – Mexican Debt Crisis, Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Leak
  9. 1990’s – Gulf War, Oklahoma City Bombing, World Trade Center Bombing
  10. 2000’s – 9/11 World Trade Center Attack, Dot Com Bubble Bursting, Housing Bubble and Burst

Further relevant reading from our other article about the current market you might find interesting are:

https://investwithsteve.com/2015/08/stock-market-pull-back-time-to-reflect/

https://investwithsteve.com/2015/09/mythical-bears-and-more-stock-market-reflections/

 

UPDATE – 1/20/2015 – We posted an article with the results of the 2015Q4 here:

2015 Q4 Update 2015 Q3 is it 2011 again or 2008?

** The information on this website is intended only for informational purposes. Investors should not act upon any of the information here without performing their own due diligence. Reh Wealth Advisor clients should discuss with their advisor if any action is appropriate.

Fed Keeps Rates Steady

interest rates -Fed Holds Steady

Despite Early Predictions – Fed keeps Rates Steady

The Federal Reserve chose to keep rates steady at 0.25%.   The Federal Reserve has telegraphed a rate hike for a couple years now preparing investors.  The Fed has kept its message pretty simple.  When it feels the economy is strong enough, it will raise rates.

Does That Mean That The Fed Doesn’t Think The Economy Can Handle a Rate Hike?

Yes and no.  In my opinion, the Economy both domestically and globally is not on as firm of ground as the Fed anticipated.  Having come out of a financial crisis in 2008, the Fed has also indicated that they are much more comfortable fighting inflation than deflation.  Their preference appears to be they would rather raise rates a little too late than too early.  The Federal Reserve has a long history of using interest rates to fight inflation.  To be honest, fighting deflation during the financial crisis had very little experience to rely on and involved several more controversial measures such as QE (and all the version of it).  Chairman Ben Bernanke face immense criticism primarily because there was no playbook for monetary policy that was proven after rates were lowered.

Will the Fed Raise Rates in October or December?

In my opinion, the primary factor will be how comfortable the Fed is with the economy.  I would also be hesitant to take to much of what the Fed is saying right now.  The Fed does not want the market to think rates will stay low for a prolonged period of time.  If the Fed signaled that, investors would increase their risk taking.  The Fed prefers at this point to have us investors think a rate hike is around the corner and when or if the economic data comes in weaker than expected, the Fed can delay what most investors have come to expect, the “inevitable” hike.

Anything New or Unique is this most Recent Fed Meeting?

While it should not be to big of a surprise to most investors, the Fed indicated while evaluating the U.S. economy that it also looks a the global economy.  The Fed basically said the were concerned the weakness is the Global Economy could spread to the U.S.  So part of the evaluation of the U.S. economy was how vulnerable the U.S. economy would be with a rate hike versus the remainder of the world.  This fact should not be too surprising.  The rest of the world has slowed down and many countries have devalued their currencies.  The devaluation causes the dollar to strengthen as we have seen.  Usually, a rate hike will also cause the currency to strengthen.  The Fed may have been looking at how much the Dollar has strengthened and adding adding pressure of another rate hike, may have caused them pause.

Going forward, it does appear that the Fed will be unlikely to raise rates on the U.S. economy unless either the U.S. economy strengthens further or even just the Global economy strengthens.  Absent both improving, we may be waiting longer for a rate hike.  Further, I would expect a more “global” Fed going forward.  While the mandate is specifically domestic in nature, I do expect to see the Fed looking globally for clues as our economies become more intertwined.

What Should Be My Takeaway?

A see a couple things important for investors to understand:

1) Predicting interest rates over the short term is very difficult.  Most experts were predicting a hike by this past June and we may not even see on in 2015 at all.

2) If there is a hike, that likely means the economy is on firm footing or that the global economy is stronger.  Our domestic and foreign stock returns would likely reflect this strength with good returns.

3) If the global economy continues to weaken or if the U.S. economy starts to weaken, our stock portfolios will likely suffer.  However, the Fed will be unlikely to raise rates and our bond portfolios would likely do well.

For these reasons, we invest in bonds and stocks and their complimentary nature allows us to build risk adjusted portfolios that match our goals.   Further, market timing of the stock market and the bond market is very difficult so we continue to rely on our diversified portfolios to weather either potential outcome.

 

 

** The information on this website is intended only for informational purposes. Investors should not act upon any of the information here without performing their own due diligence. Reh Wealth Advisor clients should discuss with their advisor if any action is appropriate.

Image by Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Mythical Bears and More Stock Market Reflections!

Mythical Bears and More Stock Market Reflections!

After our previous article:

Stock Market Pull Back Time to Reflect

Our clients have asked for more analysis.   I continue to use JP Morgan’s top notch resource for market and economic data in easy to digest slides.

Myth 1 – Market is going to drop because interest rates are going up.

 

False, as the chart below shows, when 10 year treasury yields are below 5% the stock market actually is positively correlated and rising rates are associated with rising stock prices.  This fact actually makes sense.  If the market is tanking, the Fed will be unlikely to continue to raise interest rates.  Whereas a market that continues to rise despite the Fed raising rates will cause the Fed to continue to raise rates until it reaches the tipping point where rates begin to hurt growth.  It should not no surprise the number is 5% as inflation is typically in the 4% range.

Interest Rates and Equities

Myth 2 – Companies are fragile and are poised to drop in value

 

False, Corporate cash is at an all-time high as a % of assets, dividend payout ratio is increasing but not at an unsustainable level, capital expenditures and acquisitions are on the rise indicating businesses feel good about the future.  So even with dividends increasing and share buybacks increasing, cash on the companies balance sheet has continued to rise.

Deploying Corporate Cash

Myth 3 – Bull Market has run for 7 years, we are due for a major correction

While it has been a long bull market, we typically call a bear market a 20% drop in the stock market.  We have had several recessions that have not resulted in a bear market (as shown by gray areas in chart below).  For example, from 1946 1961, there was 15 years between bear markets.   From the 1987 market crash until the tech bubble bursting we had 13 years.

Further, most bear markets have coincided with multiple factors affecting.  For example, a recession, commodity spike, and aggressive fed tightening were all factors leading the bear market of 2008.

Lets examine these factors now:

  • Recession – currently profits and sales are relatively strong but we certainly can dip into a recession.
  • Commodity Spike – The exact opposite is happening as energy costs and commodities prices have dropped dramatically.
  • Aggressive Fed Tightening – The fed does want to raise rates but they are being far from aggressive. The latest indications are that they are being tentative in raising rates as they weigh economic data.
  • Extreme Valuations – As we discussed in our previous article, valuation seem to be reasonable and not out of character.

So currently, the only factor that does concern me is the possibility of a recession and even if we have a recession, does not mean we will have a bear market where we lose 20%.

Bear Markets

Myth 4 – Markets Trend up and Trend Down Over Intermediate and Long Time Periods

In the short run (less than a year), markets go up and down and can seem like they are as likely to go up 20% as down 10%.  However, over a very long period of time, the market has trended up.  Over intermediate periods of time, the market has trended up or been a sideways market.  A sideways market is one where it oscillates with no clear trend.   The graph below illustrates its better that our memory of the dot com bust and 2008 financial crisis.

The lack of a downward trend in the intermediate term (5-10 years) is one of the major causes of market timing to fail in my opinion vs traditional asset allocation.  In an flat market, re-balancing a portfolio to the asset allocation model will generate a modest return even when the market is relatively flat.  Marking timing a bear market and missing it during a flat market only locks in your loss, then you typically get comfortable to buy right before the next drop.  In my opinion, that is why the average investor has barely beat inflation over the past 20 years.

Market since 1900

Conclusion

Please note that I am not a perma bull that thinks the market will always go up and always get double digit returns.  However, I firmly believe when investing in intermediate and longer time periods it’s important to look at these facts and realize that bear markets are a “cost of investing” because that is the risk of investing.  Further, we need to look at information and reasons we hear in the financial media to see if it makes sense and is a legitimate concern.  Currently, I do not see major red flags for a huge bear market.  That being said, bear markets are rarely correctly forecasted and the same people rarely are correct without several false positives in between.

Stock Market Pull Back – Time to Reflect

Stock Market Pull Back, Time to Put Pull Backs in Perspective

With the recent pull back, I wanted to put a few items in perspective:

1) Historical intra-year declines (pull backs)

2) Current Valuation and statistical analysis

3) P/E as a predictor of stock market performance in the short term and long term.

4) Are retail investor still trying to time the market?  Does it Work?

Annual Returns and Intra-Year Declines

The past week has been rough for the market.  The below picture shows how rough a typical year is.  The average peak decline in a calendar year is about 14%.  So while we have hit a rough patch this week, its relatively normal for most calendar years.

The average intra year decline or stock market pull back is 14%.

Current Market Valuation Measures – Hint – Market is Fairly Valued

The second slide attached shows the “standard deviation” of current vs historical valuation measures.  While they are all slightly higher (meaning the market might be slightly overvalued), the standard deviation of almost 0 indicates that the market is fairly valued and almost completely normal relative to the historical average.  The media seems to keep saying the market is over-valued lately but the statistics say otherwise.

JPMorgan 2015Q2 SP500 Valuation measure

 

P/E Ratio is Poor Predictor of Short Term Performance but much better at Intermediate Performance

The third slide, shows that if we look at the P/E ratio (price to earning), it is a terrible measure at predicting the next 12 months of performance for the stock market.  In statistics, the R Squared measure explains how much of the next 12 months is explained by the P/E ratio.  It comes in at a miserable 9% meaning that its useless for predicting short term performance.  Interestingly, the P/E ratio is a better measure for longer period performance.  The P/E ratio over 5 year periods helps explain 43% of performance of the subsequent years performance.  Further, at the current P/E ratio, we would expect the market to be positive and not much different than historical returns for the market.  (Current P/E is about 16.6).

2015 JP MorganQ32015 - PE and Returns

Market Timing and Why the Average Investor Loses

These pull backs often cause fear and investor might sell after a drop. Is this a real danger?

The simple answer is yes.  In my opinion, the next slide shows that the average investor sells stocks when they get scared and buys stocks when they are comfortable.  It helps explain how the average investor has managed to under perform nearly every asset class returning 2.5% and barely beating inflation which returned 2.4%.  If there is any chart that shows the danger of market timing, its the one below.

Average investor Returns

 

 

I know your next question.  You are going to ask me if investors recently have learned their lessons better?  Well, on to the next chart:

Equity inflows and Outflows from Retail Investors

Yikes!  From 2009 until 2012, the retail investor has been selling their equities missing out on much of the recent run up in the market.  In 2013, nearly 5 years after the financial crisis of 2008, the retail investor finally returned to the stock market.  Further, the retail investor has been selling their stocks and buying bonds.  Looking at institutional investors (pensions funds, endowments, etc), we see that they mostly have been adding funds to US equities as the retail investor has been selling.

So despite the relatively common knowledge that timing the stock market is difficult, retail investors continue to be late to party on bull markets, and will likely sell their stocks after the market drops, again showing that timing the market can be hazardous to your retirement goals.

Tolerating volatility is difficult and why it is critical to build a portfolio that will allow you to ride out challenging periods in the stock market.

 

The Take Away or Lesson from this Post?

What is our takeaway from this?  Market declines in a year are very common even in years that end up with good positive performance.  Market Valuation measures are not screaming that the market is over or under valued but rather that its a pretty boring fairly valued.  Lastly, valuation measures are poor guides for short term performance, so we should be careful about making knee jerk reactions to numbers and stories we hear in the media.

And the Final Reminder – While we try to look at markets rationally, they simply are not rationale in the short term.  If investors start to panic and start selling equities and they witness this downturn, we certainly can see a much bigger drop.  However, if the fundamentals stay strong, it should prove to be another bump in the road.  Pullbacks similar to this are healthy for the market to remind investors that the stock market is risky.

 

I would like to thank JP Morgan for their always excellent quarterly guide to the markets where the slides came from.

https://www.jpmorganfunds.com/cm/Satellite?UserFriendlyURL=diguidetomarkets&pagename=jpmfVanityWrapper

** The information on this website is intended only for informational purposes.  Reh Wealth Advisor clients should discuss with their advisor if any action is appropriate.

IRA Rollovers – Simple and GREAT chart from the IRS

IRA Rollovers – Simple and GREAT chart from the IRS

One major questions invstors have with their retirement plans at retirement:

Can I Roll my 401k, SEP, 403b, 457 Plan into an IRA?

Thankfully, the IRS has provided us a great Chart we can use to determine if a plan can be rolled over into an IRA.

 

IRS_IRA_Rollover_chart_401k_SEP_457_ROTH_SIMPLE

 

Source:

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/rollover_chart.pdf

** The information on this website is intended only for informational purposes. Investors should not act upon any of the information here without performing their own due diligence. Reh Wealth Advisor clients should discuss with their advisor if any action is appropriate.

Investor Protection – The Department of Labor – Advisors Should Act in Your Best Interest – I Agree!

Investor Protection – The Department of Labor – Advisors Should Act in Your Best Interest – I Agree!

Alert_Financial_Advisors_Your_Best_InterestsThe department of Labor has an article where they are blunt about investment advice that involves a conflict of interest.  As you know, I am a fee-only advisor precisely because of the Department of Labors Concerns and:

1) I am a fiduciary that will act in your best interest

2) I LOVE being able to tell people that regardless of what investment product I recommend, my compensation does not change.  It is liberating to be able to choose the best product without regards to how I get paid.  My compensation/fee is easy to calculate, understand, and is completely transparent.  You know exactly what you are paying for.

Here is the Article:

https://blog.dol.gov/2015/02/23/what-you-need-to-know-about-retirement-conflicts-of-interest-in-3-big-sentences/

and here is a video they embedded in the article.  Please note that this video is the department of labor’s video and not mine but it demonstrate the potential conflict of interest for some advisors.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBs6H1P7Wd0

How is a fee only Advisor Different than the Video? 

Simple! We get paid ONLY the fee agreed upon by the client.  We then seek out the best pricing for the investment product we use.  We have an incentive to locate the best product for you, without the bias of how much we will get paid.

What Should You Do? Investigate if Your Advisor is Working in Your Best Interest

1) Ask if your advisor makes a different level of compensation depending on the product they recommend

2) Ask your advisor how they are paid.  If you are paying a fee, ask if that is the ONLY compensation they receive related to your accounts

3) Ask if your advisor is a fiduciary and will always act in your best interests.  In my investment advisory and financial planning contracts I am a fiduciary and am contractually obligated to act in my client’s best interest and disclose any and all conflicts of interest.

 

 

** The information on this website is intended only for informational purposes. Investors should not act upon any of the information here. Reh Wealth Advisor clients should discuss with their advisor if any action is appropriate.

Image by Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net.  Video from the US Department of Labor

Investor Protection – Beware of “Senior / Retirement Designations / Specialist”

Investor Protection – Beware of “Senior / Retirement Designations / Specialist”

Investor Protection Beware Senior Specialist Retirement Specialist Titles

In this article covering investor protection we look at “titles” for advisors.  One trend that investors should be cautious of is the creation of designations or titles in the finance world that imply expertise in financial planning for seniors and retirees.  These “Retirement Designations” should be viewed with caution.

There Are Few Legitimate “Senior or Retirement Designations” that are meaningful

While at first it may appear that someone that is a “specialist” in the retirement planning or senior planning is exactly what you need if you are a retiree or a senior, the truth is that there are few, if any, rigorous designations or official specializations that I am aware of.

Massachusetts Has Banned Bogus Senior Designations Since 2007

As detailed by the Boston Globe here:

https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2015/07/14/lpl-financial-settles-title-inflation-case-with-massachusetts/VCRh9J877VoziDxvfCp6BP/story.html

LPL Financial, which is based in Boston, has been fined $250,000 after state regulator said its advisors were using titles and designations that didn’t measure up.  Secretary of State William F. Galvin actually said that 10 different senior designations were used that violated the state law which has been in effect since 2007.

William F. Galvin states:

“In these days when workers are increasingly having to assume responsibility for their retirement savings, it is vital that the financial services industry not employ titles that suggest an expertise in advising senior citizens when none exists…..That is why Massachusetts has these rules in place.” – William F. Galvin Secretary of State Massachusetts.

AARP Provides Recommendations to States to Prevent the Misleading Use of Senior Designations

The AARP’s Public Policy Institute has released a 6 page recommendations to States to help curtail the misleading use of designations.  You can read the recommendations here:

http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/ppi/cons-prot/i40-senior.pdf

The SEC has issued a Warning About “Senior Specialists” and “Retirement Advisors”

At the link below the SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, issued a warning about these designations.

http://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/senior-profdes.htm

http://investor.gov/employment-retirement/retirement/senior-specialists-designations

As stated by the SEC in the links provided:

“The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) do not endorse professional designations or titles such as “senior specialist” or “retirement advisor” that some financial professionals use to market themselves.

The requirements for being designated as a “senior specialist” vary greatly. In some cases, a financial professional may need to pass several rigorous exams and have several years of experience working in a particular field to receive a specialist designation. Other “senior specialist” designations may be relatively quick and easy to obtain, even for an individual with no relevant experience” – Securities and Exchange Commission

The Take-Away

While outside of Massachusetts, Advisors can use senior and retiree specialist titles but the investing public should take these titles with a grain of salt.  The CFP designation and CFA Charter demonstrate much higher levels of experience and training than the other titles.  Both programs go into great details on investing and financial planning for seniors and retirees.  Further, I question the wisdom of a program offering those designations when the SEC and state regulators have specifically called out that type of designation.

** The information on this website is intended only for informational purposes. Investors should not act upon any of the information here. Reh Wealth Advisor clients should discuss with their advisor if any action is appropriate.

Image by Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Asset Transfer Pyramid – Estate Planning Explained

Asset Transfer Pyramid – Estate Planning Explained

Estate Planning Explained - The asset transfer pyramid by Steve Reh CFA CFP Reh Wealth Advisors LLC
Estate Planning Explained – The asset transfer pyramid by Steve Reh CFA CFP Reh Wealth Advisors LLC

One of first keys to Estate Planning is understanding how assets transfer.  The “Asset Transfer Pyramid” provides are great visual aid.  The top of the pyramid takes priority.  If an asset transfers by any step above, it will ignore the layers below it on the pyramid.  Therefore, to check how an asset transfers you:

  1. First check if the asset transfers by title
  2. Then check the beneficiary designation (if it has one)
  3. If owned by a trust, the asset can pass via the trust document. In order for an asset to pass via trust, it must not pass via title or beneficiary designation.  A trust can be the owner via title and the trust can be named a beneficiary.
  4. If the asset does not pass by Title, Beneficiary Designation or Trust, the asset will likely pass through probate (below the dotted line). Probate is a legal process in court that identifies and distributes a person’s property.
  5. If there is a will, the probate court will enforce the wishes of the will.
  6. If there is no will (called intestate), it will pass according to state law.

By using these rules, you can craft an estate plan that will help you achieve your goals.

Jennifer L Field is an attorney in Claremont and an expert in Estate Planning.  I have asked her to help answer some common questions she sees with titles and estate planning.

Common Asset Transfer Problems by Jennifer L. Field

  1. Not doing anything – The most common mistake in asset titling is not making any arrangements with the financial institution regarding what will happen at your death. If your asset is 1) not held in trust, 2) doesn’t have a joint tenant, and 3) doesn’t have a named beneficiary, that asset will be subject to probate when you die.  That means 1) the asset won’t be available to your heirs for a minimum of 40 days, 2) your heirs may require a full probate proceeding to access the asset, and 3) the asset may not be distributed as you wish.  There are some circumstances in which leaving an asset titled in your name alone is a valid estate planning decision.  However, the consequences of doing so should always be examined before making that decision.
  2. Holding property in one spouse’s name only – Most married couples hold most of their community property assets in joint tenancy. Joint tenancy implies an automatic right of survivorship.  That means when the first spouse dies, the asset will go to the surviving spouse as a matter of law.  (Although there may be a little paperwork needed to formalize the transfer.)  But some married individuals hold assets in their names alone.  Sometimes this done intentionally, often it is not.  If the consequences of doing so are not considered, holding property in this manner can result in a court probate proceeding and assets being transferred to individuals other than the surviving spouse, such as children (including minor children, which creates another area of problems) and other relatives.Image Courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
  1. Not understanding which document will control – Many people assume that if they have a will or a trust, every asset will be governed by that document. That is not the case.  For example, properties held in joint tenancy will go to the surviving joint tenant(s) and accounts with named beneficiaries will go to those beneficiaries.  This will be true even if the result conflicts with the terms of your trust or will.  Only assets titled in the name of the trust will go pursuant to the trust instrument.  Assets that don’t fall into any of these categories will go pursuant to your will, or if there is none, according to state law.  It is important to carefully consider where you want each asset to go on your death and make sure that your estate plan will produce that result.
  1. Not updating designations/document after major events – Events such as births, deaths, marriages, divorces, changing medical conditions, changing residence locations, and changing relationships all may potentially result in a change being made to one or more estate planning document. Any time one of these events occurs, it is important to review your estate plan in light of that change and consider whether you should make any changes to your provisions.
  1. Naming minors as beneficiaries – Although it is fairly common to name minor children as direct beneficiarImage Courtesy of David Castillo Dominici at FreeDigitalPhotos.neties of life insurance and retirement accounts, it is usually a bad idea to do so. A minor beneficiary cannot inherit, so a court Guardianship proceeding will generally be required.  This is both expensive and inconvenient.  In addition, guardianship courts do not have power to continue to control the asset once the minor reaches adulthood.  Thus, the child will receive the inheritance in full, no strings attached, at 18.  If you have minor beneficiaries, and you wish to avoid guardianship, you should consider creating an trust to hold these assets after your death.  You can name who you wish to be in charge of the assets and set forth the purposes the assets can be utilized for.
  2. Not funding your trust – Some people believe that merely creating a trust is sufficient to avoid probate. No so.  In order for an asset to be part of a trust, title to that asset must be transferred to the trust.  Simply discussing the asset in the trust or listing it on a schedule of assets will not transfer title.  You must actually make the trust the owner of that asset.  For real property, a deed must be recorded.  For accounts at financial institutions, you must change title with the institution itself.  Only then will the asset truly be owned by the trust.  Likewise, keep in mind that pour-over wills that leave your estate to your trust do not avoid probate.  They simply direct your assets to the trust in the event that probate is necessary because title wasn’t transferred during your lifetime.  Check out the article on Retirewire on: Living Trusts – common problem solved! Please fund your trust
  1. Using joint tenancy as an estate planning device – It is generally a bad idea to try to take an estate planning shortcut by adding a beneficiary to an asset as a joint tenant to avoid probate. Doing so creates an irrevocable gift to that beneficiary and establishes the beneficiary as a current owner of the asset.  This results the asset being subject to the beneficiary’s creditors and many other major unintended consequences.  Generally speaking, a trust is the more prudent way to avoid probate.
  2. Not considering retirement accounts – Careful thought must be given as to how tax deferred assets should be planned for.  They should not be transferred to a trust during lifetime.  Instead, beneficiary designations should be used to avoid probate.  It is possible to name a trust as the beneficiary, but the consequences of doing so should be discussed with your attorney as it may result in unintended tax consequences.

Thank you for the opportunity to address these common issues.  Please feel free to contact me regarding any estate planning questions you may have.

Law Office of Jennifer L. Field
405 N. Indian Hill Boulevard
Claremont, CA 91711
(909) 625-0220
jfield@jlfieldlaw.com
www.jlfieldlaw.com

LawOfficesofJenniferLField

 

Thank you Jennifer for contributing your expertise to this article.  I hope you found our Asset Transfer Pyramid and Jennifer’s Comments Helpful!

 

UPDATE 10/6/2016 – Check out the article I wrote for Retirewire discussing a similar topic

Living Trusts – common problem solved! Please fund your trust

 

 

UPDATE 3/14/2017 – Check out the article on Retirewire where I help explain a Potential Estate Planning Issue with Power of Attorneys.

 

 

** The information in this article is intended only for informational purposes. Investors should not act upon any of the information here. Reh Wealth Advisor clients should discuss with their advisor if any action is appropriate.

Confusion Image Courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Child with money Image Courtesy of David Castillo Dominici at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

529 Plans, Common Questions – US News and World Report Quotes Stephen Reh of Reh Wealth Advisors LLC

529 Questions - Common Questions About Withdrawals
529 Questions – Common Questions About Withdrawals

Andrea Williams wrote a great article on 529 Plans covering 4 questions that people commonly run into.  She quoted me in the article and you can read about it below:

http://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/paying-for-college/articles/2015/06/17/4-common-questions-about-spending-529-college-savings-funds

Brief Synopsis:

1) Are Laptops/Computers a Qualified Expense? – Laptops, desktops, and in my opinion, any high dollar equipment for school are only qualified if they are required for the class.  For example, if you are taking a cooking class and they provide mixers and you are not required to buy one, you can’t buy that Kitchen Aid Mixer you have been looking at with your 529 funds.

2) What if the student earns a Scholarship and no longer needs the Funds? –  You can withdraw funds for the amount of scholarship and avoid a penalty but you will pay pro-rata capital gains on any tax deferred earnings.  Alternatively, you can change beneficiaries and use it for another students education expenses.

3) Can you pay for Off-Campus Housing? – Yes but you need to contact the school to determine what the Federal Allowance for financial aid purposes for off campus housing.  You cannot exceed that amount.

4) When is the right time to Withdraw Funds? – You will want to withdraw funds in the tax/calendar year you pay the expenses.

** The information on this website is intended only for informational purposes. Investors should not act upon any of the information here. Reh Wealth Advisor clients should discuss with their advisor if any action is appropriate.

Image courtesy of hywards at FreeDigitalPhotos.net